Alexander Riegel
  • Welcome
  • Blog
  • Offerings
    • Spiritual Study Journaling Course Support Page
  • Retreats
  • Spiritual Direction
  • Audio/Video
    • Pavamana (asa to ma) Mantra
  • Registrations
  • Notifications/Contact
  • Photos Page

A Legacy of Lies?

3/1/2019

 
Your vision will become clear only when you can look into your own heart.
Who looks outside, dreams; who looks inside, awakens.

                                                                                                                           – Carl Jung

   In my work as a Spiritual Director, I have noticed over time that my clients almost universally encounter certain predictable impediments on the spiritual path.  One such impediment is “ego death”; the realization that eventually dawns upon one that in order truly to make progress on the path, one must give up who one is in order to become who one is yet to be.  Even though people may profess to want personal transformation, once they realize the cost – their egoic identity – they decide that the devil they know is better than the angel they don’t. Convincing, self-deceptive rationalizations for abandoning the journey usually follow in short order.
   Another such impediment is when people realize (usually unconsciously) that they don’t have very deep conviction about the why and wherefore of their spiritual journey. Back in the day (read “somewhere between two and three thousand years ago”) the why and wherefore was very clear: to achieve direct, subjective experience of one’s essential (Divine) self:

The self-existent Lord pierced the senses
To turn outward. Thus we look to the world
Outside and see not the Self within.
A sage withdrew his senses from the world
Of change and seeking immortality,
Looked within and beheld the deathless Self.

                                                                                                             - Katha Upanishad

   Nowadays motivations vary quite a bit: idle curiosity, self-development, it’s the “in thing,” etc.  The problem with these motivations, however, is that though laudable, what fuels them, namely, mental determination and self-will, have very little staying power.  Because of this, people’s study and practice rarely delivers the goods and as is the case with ego death, they soon find convincing, self-deceptive rationalizations for abandoning the journey.
   When I encounter a client whose motivation proves insufficient to the task (the greatest indicator is that her journey is one of lengthy fits and starts), I prompt her to reconsider her motivation.  To cut to the chase, I eventually find the opportunity to relate the above passage from the Katha Upanishad. Then I ask, “So, what is your version of you? Do you believe that there is within you a ‘deathless self’; an essential (Divine) self that you can discover, or do you believe that the Katha Upanishad is part of a legacy of lies?”
   Very few people have a ready answer for this question because very few people have actually thought it through (Remember, motivations for the spiritual journey are quite varied, most of which don’t prompt this question.).  When encouraged to think it through, most people remain ambiguous about it. I attribute their ambiguity to the fact that we now live in a predominantly scientific and psychological age, two disciplines that have cast serious shadow over traditional notion of the self, i.e., that we have a soul.  Given this, I invite you to consider the following.
   In our modern world we are quick to psychologize away that against which we are biased.  No offense intended to my psychologist friends (a very similar point could be made regarding scientists) but so ubiquitous has become the tendency to psychologize away mystical experience that when it comes to spiritual matters, many psychologists today (and much of the populace at large) are like the man holding the hammer to whom everything looks like a nail.  Rejoinder: Sometimes a mystical experience is just a mystical experience.
   Granted that people often mistake egoic experiences as mystical, we should nevertheless be very hesitant to sweep the Upanishads and other mystical texts (i.e., Buddhist, Christian, and Sufi mystical texts) under the psychological rug.  These texts do not represent a legacy of lies. Rather, they represent universal truth claims that result from deep meditative states achieved by lifelong practitioners of refined consciousness - w
ithin every one of the world’s major religious traditions.  Having stated this, let us now return to the crux of this post.
   If you are someone who has had a difficult time sustaining a spiritual practice, I invite you to reconsider your motivation for it is likely that that difficulty stems from a motivation that is insufficient to the task.  Obviously, from what I have already written, the belief that one has an essential (Divine) self that one can discover is from whence proper and sufficient motive arises. At least, this is
this mystic’s opinion.  So, I ask,

What is your version of you?
   In the meantime, I hear tell of a story about a merchant who once sold everything he owned to purchase a pearl of great price, on which more, see my next post...

Namaste,

Alex


Comments are closed.

    Archives

    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    October 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018

    Categories

    All
    Advaita
    Hafez
    Ichazo
    Jesus
    Li Po
    Mirabai
    Mystical Musings
    Mystic Poetry
    Naranjo
    Plato
    Ram Dass
    Rumi
    Spiritual Practice
    St. Francis Of Assisi
    Sufism
    Upanishads
    Walcott

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Welcome
  • Blog
  • Offerings
    • Spiritual Study Journaling Course Support Page
  • Retreats
  • Spiritual Direction
  • Audio/Video
    • Pavamana (asa to ma) Mantra
  • Registrations
  • Notifications/Contact
  • Photos Page